<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intel&#8217;s D945GCLF2 Little Falls 2: The DiAtomic Mainboard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.logicsupply.com/blog/2008/10/16/intels-little-falls-2-the-diatomic-mainboard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.logicsupply.com/blog/2008/10/16/intels-little-falls-2-the-diatomic-mainboard/</link>
	<description>Blog, News &#38; Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:31:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristina</title>
		<link>http://www.logicsupply.com/blog/2008/10/16/intels-little-falls-2-the-diatomic-mainboard/comment-page-1/#comment-8940</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 14:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logicsupply.com/blog/?p=218#comment-8940</guid>
		<description>Hi Eric,
We are told that the Little Falls 2 will be around for another 18 months.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Eric,<br />
We are told that the Little Falls 2 will be around for another 18 months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.logicsupply.com/blog/2008/10/16/intels-little-falls-2-the-diatomic-mainboard/comment-page-1/#comment-8939</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 14:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logicsupply.com/blog/?p=218#comment-8939</guid>
		<description>What is the estimated lifespan of Little Falls 2 from now?
Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the estimated lifespan of Little Falls 2 from now?<br />
Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nnarayann</title>
		<link>http://www.logicsupply.com/blog/2008/10/16/intels-little-falls-2-the-diatomic-mainboard/comment-page-1/#comment-7102</link>
		<dc:creator>nnarayann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 22:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logicsupply.com/blog/?p=218#comment-7102</guid>
		<description>Hi all!!. I´ve recently bought a “Little Falls” mobo and I´m just wondering if there´s any chance of soldering a S-Video connector and make it works, considerating that both motherboards are almost identical...

Thanks, and sorry for my english.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi all!!. I´ve recently bought a “Little Falls” mobo and I´m just wondering if there´s any chance of soldering a S-Video connector and make it works, considerating that both motherboards are almost identical&#8230;</p>
<p>Thanks, and sorry for my english.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.logicsupply.com/blog/2008/10/16/intels-little-falls-2-the-diatomic-mainboard/comment-page-1/#comment-4073</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 22:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logicsupply.com/blog/?p=218#comment-4073</guid>
		<description>Sure does - and i want to thank you for the input and the fast reply. I just needed that confirmation from someone better versed on the subject than myself. 

So, I hope I&#039;m not opening a can of worms here but the question remains. Why? Why did intel decide to switch to 24 pins with the revision. Rumors from some are that it is to support the designs of oems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure does &#8211; and i want to thank you for the input and the fast reply. I just needed that confirmation from someone better versed on the subject than myself. </p>
<p>So, I hope I&#8217;m not opening a can of worms here but the question remains. Why? Why did intel decide to switch to 24 pins with the revision. Rumors from some are that it is to support the designs of oems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: josh</title>
		<link>http://www.logicsupply.com/blog/2008/10/16/intels-little-falls-2-the-diatomic-mainboard/comment-page-1/#comment-4071</link>
		<dc:creator>josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 21:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logicsupply.com/blog/?p=218#comment-4071</guid>
		<description>Mike,

Thanks for the insight about the Zalman heat sinks.

As for the 24-pin BTX power connector on the Little Falls 2, those extra 4 pins are NOT necessary for the board to function. The vast majority of our systems use the standard 20-pin ATX power connector (or a PicoPSU) with no ill effects.

The board does still require a separate 4-pin P4 power connector in order to function. Our PicoPSU-90 comes with this connector attached; the PicoPSU-120 will need this cable: http://www.logicsupply.com/products/pwr_mp

I hope this answers your question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike,</p>
<p>Thanks for the insight about the Zalman heat sinks.</p>
<p>As for the 24-pin BTX power connector on the Little Falls 2, those extra 4 pins are NOT necessary for the board to function. The vast majority of our systems use the standard 20-pin ATX power connector (or a PicoPSU) with no ill effects.</p>
<p>The board does still require a separate 4-pin P4 power connector in order to function. Our PicoPSU-90 comes with this connector attached; the PicoPSU-120 will need this cable: <a href="http://www.logicsupply.com/products/pwr_mp" rel="nofollow">http://www.logicsupply.com/products/pwr_mp</a></p>
<p>I hope this answers your question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

